Some quick thoughts after 1 day's use of the Roku Netflix Player
As I’d read, the device is very simple — just a tiny and light black box, a power supply and a remote. Setup was easy, once I’d fixed a stuck button on the remote. I’d wondered how the Player linked itself to a specific Netflix account — would I have to laboriously type in my username & password via the remote? Instead, the player displays an activation code. You then go to your computer, sign into Netflix and enter the code there, linking your account to the Player. Pretty easy.
Initially I connected the Player to my network via WiFi, despite some misgivings about signal strength in my house. Regardless, the WiFi worked fine and the picture quality didn’t stutter or degrade. I noticed no change when I switched the player from WiFi to ethernet.
So far I’ve mostly watched TV shows, which I think is the Player’s sweet spot. They are short, and the picture quality isn’t of primary importance. Even under the best of conditions, the Player’s picture is not DVD quality. It’s certainly better than watching shows via YouTube, but it’s not quite good enough for watching anything with stellar cinematography.
Speaking of picture quality, I can’t quite figure out how it’s determined. When the Player starts to load a show, it displays a quality rating: 1 to 4. I first thought that the quality had something to do with network speed, but now I’m not so sure. For example, if I start playing National Treasure 2 I get a quality rating of 2. And the picture is quite blurry. It’s still watchable, but it’s noticeably poor. However, if I switch right over to an episode of Red Dwarf, I get a quality of 3 or 4, and it looks great. If I go back to the movie, the quality goes back to 2. So how is quality determined? I suspect that the content provider has some control. Hopefully this improves when Netflix is able to add 480p playback.
I have a few more small quibbles with the Player so far. As with any streaming media player, fast-forward & reverse are a problem. Skimming through a show, or just skipping a short bit of time isn’t really feasible, as the player has to re-buffer the show every time you skip forward or backward. On the plus side, if you start watching a show, take a break and come back to it later, you’ll start back up at the spot where you left off.
Lastly, the selection of shows available for the Player isn’t quite 4-star. Take a good look at the inventory before investing in the Roku Player. If you look right now, you’ll see a decent variety of BBC shows, and you might think “Yay, I can watch a lot of Dr. Who and Red Dwarf!” And this is true…for now. As far as I can tell, all of the BBC shows will be removed from streaming on December 1st, 2008. Will the removal be permanent or is it just a temporary thing while the Beeb and Netflix sign a new agreement? I have no idea. That’s why I’m in the middle of a Red Dwarf marathon, watching all 52 episodes over the course of a week.
Beyond British television, the next-best represented genre is probably documentary films, including many made for PBS. There are theatrical films available, of course, but with a few exceptions (Superbad, Ratatouille, No Country For Old Men), most of them are either terrible (Wild Hogs) or particularly terrible (Species 4: The Awakening). There are films available that I want to watch, but if the picture quality continues to be poor, then I’d prefer to just rent the DVD.
That said, I expect the breadth of Netflix’s selection to improve. Internet distribution makes a certain amount of sense, and the idea seems to be catching on. After some time, and maybe a change or two to the revenue model (I wouldn’t be surprised by pre-show ads, a la Hulu), the quantity and quality of content available should be much better.
November 13th, 2008 / Trackback